Bureau of DisruptionAll schools · Liberal arts college
Williams College · Anthropology40.7% of Williams College's Anthropology course descriptions are framed from the left. Across all 100 schools' Anthropology departments, it is 10.4%.
Subject places what a course studies, not the side it takes. A course on slavery or the Holocaust lands far right and a course on Marx or the Soviet Union lands far left, whether the course praises, criticizes or simply describes it.
Anthropology
Cross-listings: REL 258 / WGSS 225 / ASIA 258 Primary Cross-listing This course considers how three women profoundly shaped the Buddha's life and legacy in terms of social change & reproductive justice. Our central characters are Maya--the…
Anthropology
Cross-listings: AMST 305 / WGSS 305 / THEA 304 Secondary Cross-listing Bears. Cubs. Otters. Pups. Twinks. Radical Fairies. Leathermen. Mollies. Drag queens. Dandies. Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. Gay men, including gay trans men, have…
Anthropology
In 2020, tens of thousands of farmers parked their tractors on major highways leading into India's national capital of Delhi, erected a city of tents and camped out until--sixteen months later--the legislation they were protesting was…
None. Williams College Anthropology has 11 courses with a left-of-center subject and not one with a right-of-center subject.
Share of courses described from the left. Percent of all courses in the group whose Framing reading is leftward: the description frames its subject one-sidedly to the left.
Counted: all courses in the group, including N and I. No interval is published for this number.
| Name | Metric | Value | 95% interval | n | scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams College · Anthropology | bias_left_share | 40.7 | — | 27 | — |
| Anthropology | bias_left_share | 10.4 | 9.8 – 11.1 | 9,234 | — |