Princeton University · English & Comparative Literature
10.6% of Princeton University's English & Comparative Literature course descriptions are framed from the left. Across all 100 schools' English & Comparative Literature departments, it is 6.3%.
0%35%
Princeton University: 10.6% English & Comparative Literature at all 100 schools: 6.3% each other school in the comparison
COM 589 · Contemporary Latin American Feminisms and the Question of Justice and Accountability92
English & Comparative Literature
This course focuses on how the renewed analysis of a relationality among different violences generated by popular feminisms impact our understanding of justice and accountability. Taking the crossings between social reproduction and prison…
ENG 597 · Humanistic Perspectives on History and Society: Marx and Race88
English & Comparative Literature
"What shall we say of the Marxian philosophy and of its relation to the American Negro?," Du Bois once asked. His answer was that "it must be modified," not because Marx was wrong but because <i>Capital</i> is one of the four "books in the…
A survey of Native American Literature. In place of US origins stories, we consider the dispossession of land and waters and the impact on the environment. We reflect on the United States' attempts to eliminate Indigenous people and…
None. Princeton University English & Comparative Literature has 17 left-framed courses and not one right-framed course.
Why this number, in plain words
Share of courses described from the left. Percent of all courses in the group whose Framing reading is leftward: the description frames its subject one-sidedly to the left.
Counted: all courses in the group, including N and I. No interval is published for this number.
Readings are of catalog description text, not of teaching, syllabi or individual professors.
Details: exact rows, definitions and method
Name
Metric
Value
95% interval
n
scored
Princeton University · English & Comparative Literature
Right-framed courses are almost absent (33 of 124,290); this run cannot tell catalog reality from model sensitivity. Compare schools with adjusted_ratio, not this raw share, because department mix differs.