Case Western Reserve University · Art & Art History
3.7% of Case Western Reserve University's Art & Art History course descriptions are framed from the left. Across all 100 schools' Art & Art History departments, it is 3.8%.
0%20%
Case Western Reserve University: 3.7% Art & Art History at all 100 schools: 3.8% each other school in the comparison
Underlined: words the model quoted from the description when we asked it, after scoring, to explain its score.
Furthest left
ARTH 310 · Art For Different Futures96
Art & Art History
The COVID-19 pandemic and the movements for social justice (Black Lives Matter, Me Too) are rapidly and dynamically altering long-held conceptions about the role of art in society. The culture industries (along with many other sectors) have…
ARTH 318 · Sketches of Spain: Imagining the Iberian World in Early Modernity67
Art & Art History
In 1764 the Indigenous artist Jose Manuel de la Cerda made a series of lacquerware trays (batea) depicting scenes from Virgil's Aeneid using a pre-Hispanic lacquer technique. Produced in west-central Mexico, these astounding objects--which…
Over the course of their long history, Jews have contended with diaspora, boundary-crossing, minority status and anti-Semitism. Along the way, art and architecture have given shape to Jewish reflections on their complex social…
None. Case Western Reserve University Art & Art History has 3 left-framed courses and not one right-framed course.
Why this number, in plain words
Share of courses described from the left. Percent of all courses in the group whose Framing reading is leftward: the description frames its subject one-sidedly to the left.
Counted: all courses in the group, including N and I. No interval is published for this number.
Readings are of catalog description text, not of teaching, syllabi or individual professors.
Details: exact rows, definitions and method
Name
Metric
Value
95% interval
n
scored
Case Western Reserve University · Art & Art History
Right-framed courses are almost absent (33 of 124,290); this run cannot tell catalog reality from model sensitivity. Compare schools with adjusted_ratio, not this raw share, because department mix differs.